Menu Close

What are the 4 cosmological arguments?

What are the 4 cosmological arguments?

A cosmological argument, in natural theology, is an argument which claims that the existence of God can be inferred from facts concerning causation, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the universe or some totality of objects.

What are the two types of cosmological argument?

Cosmological argument, Form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of God. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa theologiae, presented two versions of the cosmological argument: the first-cause argument and the argument from contingency.

Is the cosmological argument correct?

So the cosmological argument is neither a valid argument in requiring the truth of its conclusion nor is it a satisfactory argument to prove the existence of any being that would have awareness of the existence of the universe or any event within it.

What is the strongest objection to the cosmological argument?

One objection to the argument is that it leaves open the question of why the First Cause is unique in that it does not require any causes. Proponents argue that the First Cause is exempt from having a cause, while opponents argue that this is special pleading or otherwise untrue.

What are the three arguments for the existence of God?

There is certainly no shortage of arguments that purport to establish God’s existence, but ‘Arguments for the existence of God’ focuses on three of the most influential arguments: the cosmological argument, the design argument, and the argument from religious experience.

What are the weaknesses of the cosmological argument?


  • No proof of God’s existence.
  • Lots of Inductive Leaps (Hume)
  • No imperial evidence (Hume)
  • Assumptions between cause and effect.
  • The world may be infinite and doesn’t need to have a cause (Russell and Oscillating Universe Theory)
  • Contradicting statements – Everything needs a cause, but God doesn’t need a cause.

What is the first cause of the universe?

Aquinas argued that our world works in the same way. Someone or something must have caused the world to exist. The cause is God, the effect is the world. Aquinas stated that this cause (which is outside our world) is the first cause – that is, the one that started everything.

How many arguments does the existence of God have?

five arguments
Logical arguments In article 3, question 2, first part of his Summa Theologica, Thomas Aquinas developed his five arguments for God’s existence. These arguments are grounded in an Aristotelian ontology and make use of the infinite regression argument.

Who created the God?

Responses. Defenders of religion have countered that the question is improper: We ask, “If all things have a creator, then who created God?” Actually, only created things have a creator, so it’s improper to lump God with his creation. God has revealed himself to us in the Bible as having always existed.

What are the arguments for the cosmological argument?

The Cosmological arguments are a series of simple deductions that get us thinking about origins. Think about it; if there were no God, why would anything at all exist? There’s no necessity for it.

Are there any arguments for the existence of the universe?

No. So, the universe had to have a first cause to get started, and it also needs something to give it existence right now. The only thing that would not have to be given existence is a thing that exists as its very nature. It is existence.

What did David Hume say about the cosmological argument?

David Hume and later Paul Edwards have invoked a similar principle in their criticisms of the cosmological argument. Rowe has called the principle the Hume-Edwards principle: If the existence of every member of a set is explained, the existence of that set is thereby explained.

Which is the most popular argument for the existence of God?

This argument or proof proceeds from a consideration of the existence and order of the universe. This popular argument for the existence of God is most commonly known as the cosmological argument.